The Mindfulness Backlash: True or False? By Elisha Goldstein, Ph.D.

It seems like every day interest in mindfulness is reaching new heights. All the major news networks have covered it and recently Sharon Salzberg was on the Katie Couric Show explaining how to achieve mindfulness. But the question on many people’s minds is; has mindfulness become another form of snake oil, claiming to cure everything under the sun from anxiety to sneezing? Last week a post broke out on the New York Times claiming there is a “Mindfulness Backlash” afoot where some people are questioning the science, seeing it packaged as a commodity and even warning against it.

A Backlash: True or False?

Before we answer that question, it seems the concern by a number of mindfulness experts is that the science is being sensationalized and mindfulness as it is conveyed today is a commodity that is being sold for all the wrong reasons. When you trace mindfulness back to its roots, you’ll find that it is a practice among many in life to create freedom around suffering. When this happens there is complete peace and ultimately this will be healing to all beings.

First, is it true that mindfulness, as a practice and way of life is being pitched as a cure all? Not by most skilled mindfulness teachers that I’m aware of. Is the pitch for it being tailored for a variety of interests. Absolutely. If you’re in business, the motivation is stress reduction, productivity and performance. If you’re in education, the motivation is that it will help with focus, learning and test scores. If you’re a healthcare professional, it will be about emotion regulation, stress reduction, and interpersonal effectiveness. If you’re in sports you’ll do it because it helps with perspective, performance and focus.

As the 15th century Indian poet Kabir said, “Wherever you are, that’s the entry point.”

The fact is people are at various places in life and will come into this practice in different places. Perhaps one person comes in for a pure interest in awakening to a liberated life and yet another person enters into it with a need for grounding and stress reduction. Is this wrong? Or maybe a corporate attorney finds herself so scattered throughout the day with a myriad of responsibilities and hears this will help her focus, so she joins a class. Or someone who has just suffered a heart attack comes into a mindfulness-based stress reduction course at the request of his doctor.

Most credible teachers will quickly help people understand that the names (stress reduction, performance, emotional intelligence) are just for marketing, to get people in the door, and while this practice can help, the intention is much greater. My experience is as people enter the door and begin developing this awareness, the practice expands from the original boundaries of stress reduction and opens them up to a new relationship to life. They begin to see the possibility of making wiser choices to get distance from thoughts and behaviors that don’t serve them and develop the capacity to incline themselves to healthier ways of living.

This is good in my opinion!

Are there dangers?

Dr. Willoughby Britton, assistant professor of psychiatry and human behavior at Brown University works with people who feel they’ve been harmed by meditation (people who have been on long retreats). Yes, this is absolutely possible and can happen. Unfortunately, people who go on long retreats aren’t always properly assessed and should be. For example, If someone has not had much practice and is in an emotionally turbulent time of his/her life, a long retreat of going inward is probably not the best idea. This could create a flooding of emotions and there isn’t the proper training established to hold it. This could also be the case for someone coming into a mindfulness class with a background in sexual trauma and a simple body scan can reignite the trauma.

The practices we engage in do matter, but this shouldn’t create a backlash (nor do I think there actually is one, more likely a snappy title for the NY Times to sell some soap), but instead it comes down to an education on mindfulness (and a variety of factors that it represents) and finding an experienced teacher as a guide to meet the practitioner where they are at.

I’ll re-emphasize that, finding and training experienced and credible teachers needs to be the main focus here.

Often times, uncomfortable emotions are important to get curious about as we learn how to develop a new relationship to them. As Rumi said, “Don’t turn your gaze away. Look toward the bandaged place, that’s where the light enters.” An experienced teacher can help guide someone into how to do the safely and effectively. Generally speaking, the rise in mindfulness is a wonderful thing. Are there charlatans within the mindfulness profession? Of course.  But what profession is absent of this? It’s important to seek out credible teachers in your area which might be found through an online search or looking up teachers on the Center for Mindfulness website. If there are no local teachers eMindful.com is a good place to start (Note: I designed the Mindfulness at Work® program for eMindful, so I have some inside knowledge as to their credibility).

Is there a backlash?

Doubtful, but it’s important to pay attention to the quality of the teachers and the teachings. It’s also important to take the science with a grain of salt sometimes, but if it helps create the motivation to come down from your mind and into your life, more power to you. Mindfulness is not something that only belongs in the Ashrams and can absolutely be brought to the classrooms, the therapy office, the sports fields and the boardrooms.

As always, please share your thoughts, stories and questions below. Your interaction creates a living wisdom for us all to benefit from.

Republished with permission from Elisha Goldstein, Ph.D.  Originally posted at:  http://blogs.psychcentral.com/mindfulness/2014/07/the-mindfulness-backlash-true-or-false/#more-4234

 


 

Elisha Goldstein, Ph.D. is in private practice in West Los Angeles. He is author of The Now Effect: How this Moment Can Change the Rest of Your Life and coauthor of A Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Workbook, Foreword by Jon Kabat-Zinn (New Harbinger).

He synthesizes the pearls of traditional psychotherapy with a progressive integration of mindfulness to achieve mental and emotional healing. He contends that we have the power to transform our traumas and habitual patterns that keep us stuck in perpetual stress, anxiety, depression, or addiction and step into greater freedom and peace. He offers practical strategies to calm our anxious minds, transform negative emotions and facilitate greater self acceptance, freedom and inner peace.

Dr. Goldstein, who comes from a family of psychologists, advocates that mental health comes from an approach that looks at all aspects of the self – physical, mental, emotional, and even spiritual.

As a licensed Psychologist, he teaches mindfulness-based programs on his own and through InsightLA. He has spoken at the UCLA Semel Institute and Anxiety Disorder Clinic, the UCLA Mindfulness and Psychotherapy Conference headlining Thich Nhat Hanh, Jack Kornfield, and Dr. Daniel Siegel, University of Washington, among others, and is the author of the popular Mindfulness and Psychotherapy blog on Psychcentral.com and Mentalhelp.net. He has been published in The Journal of Clinical Psychology and quoted in the New York Daily News, Reuters, NPR, UCLA Today, Body & Soul, Focus, Beliefnet.com and The Week Magazine.

His previous popular CDs include Mindful Solutions for Stress, Anxiety, and Depression, Mindful Solutions for Addiction and Relapse Prevention, Mindful Solutions for Success and Stress Reduction at work, Mindful Solutions for Adults with ADD/ADHD (produced in collaboration with Lidia Zylowska M.D.) and an online multimedia program, Mindfulness, Anxiety, and Stress.

He currently offers individual and group psychotherapy in West Los Angeles and does mindfulness-based coaching nationally and internationally via the phone.

My Research by Lindsay Briner

Aloha, My name is Lindsay Briner. In 2012 I graduated from the MATP program at Sofia University, and soon after moved to Kauai, Hawaii to land my dream job as a Research Assistant to a physicist I was studying independently for many years prior. I was on a mission to integrate the new paradigm emerging in physics and the holographic principle into my transpersonal studies. Now I am returning to Sofia to fulfill my intention of accomplishing my PhD after nearly two years of working side by side with an advanced physicist. It’s good to back!

In my research I am questioning, how do physical processes in the brain give rise to subjective experience? The hard problem remains one of the largest challenges in the frontier of consciousness studies in the quest to define the mystery of mind over matter. Alternative explanations are emerging, especially since the rise of quantum mechanics, such as the Copenhagen Interpretation, where the consciousness of an observer is required to collapse the waveform probability distribution of a quantum to a single locus. Furthermore, myriad other scientifically-based studies and investigations have demonstrated that consciousness is not necessarily restricted to the electrobiochemical activity of the human brain, suggesting a nonlocal interface.

In the Orch-OR theory of consciousness, amongst others, suggest the fractal geometry of biomolecular structures to enable the transmission of information through geometrical synchronization, or resonance. Stuart Hameroff, head of the consciousness department at the University of Arizona, has identified resonance at the quantum scale in neural cells to occur every 1/44th of a second; creating a stream of conscious awareness. These results are significant in relationship to the functioning of neural networks and grey matter in the brain, as well as one’s behavior and ability to function in our present reality. Hameroff suggests implications of a “quantum soul”.

In my research, I am exploring consciousness as a non-local feedback mechanism through the application of a new paradigm emerging in quantum gravity, applied to the Orch-OR theory of consciousness. Whereby I am investigating the subatomic processes, which interface with the nonlocal, or unified field of consciousness at the level of the proton.

The implications in transpersonal psychology are vast, as these biophysics-based foundations of consciousness clearly imply our vibrational physical mechanisms of sound, light, and harmonics – beyond the paradigm of biochemical computational models of mind.